| Re: [SQLDownUnder] [SQLStyle] #1: Singular vs Plural Table Naming |
- From: David Spearritt
- Subject: Re: [SQLDownUnder] [SQLStyle] #1: Singular vs Plural Table Naming
- Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:07:03 -0700
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[CONS] Plurals for table names are generally inconsistent. Some end in "s" others "ies", others "es" or "ys" etc. So there is a higher likelihood of developers misspelling the names. [CONS] When you have a link table, you don't put the plural in each half of the name. CustomerAddresses, not CustomersAddresses, or do you?
I'm with Celko on this. The best name is a singular name that refers to the set or collection like CustomerAddressBook. David Spearritt http://www.orlitech.com.au to unsubscribe to this list, please send a message back to the list with 'unsubscribe' as the subject. Powered by mailenable.com - List managed by http://www.readify.net
(Click here for more information on the sqldownunder mailling list)
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [SQLDownUnder] [SQLStyle] #1: Singular vs Plural Table Naming
- Next by Date: [SQLDownUnder] [SQLStyle] #2: Prefixes on Table/View names
- Previous by thread: RE: [SQLDownUnder] [SQLStyle] #1: Singular vs Plural Table Naming
- Next by thread: RE: [SQLDownUnder] [SQLStyle] #1: Singular vs Plural Table Naming
- Index(es):
