| RE: [SQLDownUnder] Table Design (Names) |
- From: sql
- Subject: RE: [SQLDownUnder] Table Design (Names)
- Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 19:10:04 -0700
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: [SQLDownUnder] Table Design (Names), Greg Low
- References:
- RE: [SQLDownUnder] Table Design, Greg Low
- Prev by Date: RE: [SQLDownUnder] Table Design
- Next by Date: RE: [SQLDownUnder] Table Design
- Previous by thread: RE: [SQLDownUnder] Table Design
- Next by thread: RE: [SQLDownUnder] Table Design (Names)
- Index(es):
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
|
On the topic of storing names… what
is the best approach in collecting storing and using names? Two columns, FirstName and LastName is
obviously unsuitable for a application that is multicultural… My best guest would be to just store one
column FullName, but then there would be some application logic required to figure out
the format of the name and then pull out first name or last (family) name or… middle name? What are your experiences guys? Jonathon Kresner From:
SQLDownUnderList@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:SQLDownUnderList@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg Low Hi Jake, Couple of thoughts that might help. It sounds like you're really trying to
model several things into the one table. Whenever you find yourself adding a
column that says "what type of thing this is", you need to stop and
wonder whether it should be a separate table. In your case, it's hard to know
how many columns are common to all contacts but rather than having
everyone as a contact and then trying to subdivide the contacts, you might
consider storing the appropriate columns for each type of contact in a
separate table. Then when you need a list of contacts, you just grab them out
of all the required tables using a union statement. Also, consider how you would
"compute" a display name from a Last Name and First Name. By
"last name" are you thinking of the person's surname or are you
really talking about their "last" name? Would what you have in mind
work for people who's family names come first and their given names are last? HTH, Greg Dr Greg Low
From:
SQLDownUnderList@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:SQLDownUnderList@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jake Ginnivan Hi all, Was wondering if you could help me with my table design for
a small CRM I have running at work, I don’t think it is the best way to
do it but I don’t know how else I would do it. I want to have 3 types of entries, Individuals, Companies
and Contacts. Contacts are individuals that are entered under a company. At the moment I have something like this. Id, Type (int 0 for company, 1 for individual, 2 for contact), Display Name (what will be displayed in crm, either business
name, or individual name depending on type, this is a computed column which is
persistent) Company, Firstname Lastname And a few other things, email address/phone numbers are
stored in related tables. My problem is that when I query for the data, I exclude type
2, they are displayed below when a company is selected. But I want the company
related to the contact to be displayed if that record matches the search terms. What I want to be able to do is all entries of type 2 that
are matched, add the company entry to the results, then at the end remove all
duplicates, I can see this is a extremely inefficient way to do it (if
possible), so if anyone can help me with the Table design I would greatly
appreciate it. Jake Ginnivan to unsubscribe to this list, please send a message back to the list
with 'unsubscribe' as the subject. Powered by mailenable.com - List managed by
http://www.readify.net |
(Click here for more information on the sqldownunder mailling list)
