Review priorities as we approach juno-3

    I just send this email out to openstack-dev, but I am posting it here in case it makes it more discoverable to people drowning in email:

    To: openstack-dev
    Subject: [nova] Review priorities as we approach juno-3
    
    Hi.
    
    We're rapidly approaching j-3, so I want to remind people of the
    current reviews that are high priority. The definition of high
    priority I am using here is blueprints that are marked high priority
    in launchpad that have outstanding code for review -- I am sure there
    are other reviews that are important as well, but I want us to try to
    land more blueprints than we have so far. These are listed in the
    order they appear in launchpad.
    
    == Compute Manager uses Objects (Juno Work) ==
    
    https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/compute-manager-objects-juno,n,z
    
    This is ongoing work, but if you're after some quick code review
    points they're very easy to review and help push the project forward
    in an important manner.
    
    == Move Virt Drivers to use Objects (Juno Work) ==
    
    I couldn't actually find any code out for review for this one apart
    from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94477/, is there more out there?
    
    == Add a virt driver for Ironic ==
    
    This one is in progress, but we need to keep going at it or we wont
    get it merged in time.
    
    * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111223/ was approved, but a rebased
    ate it. Should be quick to re-approve.
    * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111423/
    * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111425/
    * ...there are more reviews in this series, but I'd be super happy to
    see even a few reviewed
    
    == Create Scheduler Python Library ==
    
    * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82778/
    * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104556/
    
    (There are a few abandoned patches in this series, I think those two
    are the active ones but please correct me if I am wrong).
    
    == VMware: spawn refactor ==
    
    * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104145/
    * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104147/ (Dan Smith's -2 on this one
    seems procedural to me)
    * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105738/
    * ...another chain with many more patches to review
    
    Thanks,
    Michael
    


    The actual email thread is at http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-August/043098.html.

    Tags for this post: openstack juno review nova ptl
    Related posts: Juno Nova PTL Candidacy; Thoughts from the PTL; Expectations of core reviewers; Juno nova mid-cycle meetup summary: social issues; Juno nova mid-cycle meetup summary: slots; Juno nova mid-cycle meetup summary: nova-network to Neutron migration

posted at: 13:01 | path: /openstack/juno | permanent link to this entry