|Review priorities as we approach juno-3|
I just send this email out to openstack-dev, but I am posting it here in case it makes it more discoverable to people drowning in email:
To: openstack-dev Subject: [nova] Review priorities as we approach juno-3 Hi. We're rapidly approaching j-3, so I want to remind people of the current reviews that are high priority. The definition of high priority I am using here is blueprints that are marked high priority in launchpad that have outstanding code for review -- I am sure there are other reviews that are important as well, but I want us to try to land more blueprints than we have so far. These are listed in the order they appear in launchpad. == Compute Manager uses Objects (Juno Work) == https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/compute-manager-objects-juno,n,z This is ongoing work, but if you're after some quick code review points they're very easy to review and help push the project forward in an important manner. == Move Virt Drivers to use Objects (Juno Work) == I couldn't actually find any code out for review for this one apart from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94477/, is there more out there? == Add a virt driver for Ironic == This one is in progress, but we need to keep going at it or we wont get it merged in time. * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111223/ was approved, but a rebased ate it. Should be quick to re-approve. * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111423/ * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111425/ * ...there are more reviews in this series, but I'd be super happy to see even a few reviewed == Create Scheduler Python Library == * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82778/ * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104556/ (There are a few abandoned patches in this series, I think those two are the active ones but please correct me if I am wrong). == VMware: spawn refactor == * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104145/ * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104147/ (Dan Smith's -2 on this one seems procedural to me) * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105738/ * ...another chain with many more patches to review Thanks, Michael
The actual email thread is at http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-August/043098.html.
Tags for this post: openstack juno review nova ptl
Related posts: Expectations of core reviewers; Juno nova mid-cycle meetup summary: slots; Juno nova mid-cycle meetup summary: social issues; Juno Nova PTL Candidacy; Thoughts from the PTL; Juno nova mid-cycle meetup summary: conclusion
posted at: 13:01 | path: /openstack/juno | permanent link to this entry