stillhq.com : Mikal, a geek from Canberra living in Silicon Valley (no blather posts)

Tech talk blogs

Sun, 16 Apr 2006 21:00:00 GMT

Rocky is seeking technology blogs for tech talk blogs, which is a lot like a Microsoft funded planet instance, but with custom code and a voting mechanism for posts. Given I'm aggregated there as well as Planet Linux Australia, I guess I am doing my bit. So, should I submit the RSS feed for Planet LA? Hmmmmmmm.

Tags for this post: dotnet aggregator technology australia
Related posts: Bloglines unreliable today; In Sydney!; American visas for all!; Melbourne; Sydney Australia in Google Maps; Top Gear Australia; Linux presence at Education Expo; In Australia, alive; I'm getting fed up; Mirror traffic during the last day of LCA 2007; Beware the concierge at the Rendezvous Hotel!; Pandora; Avoidance behaviour, or, wanted: video RSS feeds; In Canberra; We're getting there; More on the new E-3 Visa; Mirroring the Linux Update podcast; Microsoft TechEd flair; Looking for Women studying computing in Australia; Getting ready to leave Sydney; Sensis Australian search

Comment

TechTalkBlogs

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:15:00 GMT

Geoff has some comments on TechTalkBlogs most of which seem sensible to me. I think it is possible to show user ratings from online aggregators such as TechTalkBlogs without changing the modified date of posts though... Either don't update the modified date in the post itself, or pack the information into an image which is used in the post but isn't part of the post itself.

Tags for this post: dotnet techtalkblogs aggregator online planet
Related posts: Planet; Online aggregators; Bloglines unreliable today; My thesis worries are over; I'm getting fed up; Avoidance behaviour, or, wanted: video RSS feeds; Wrong timezone batman!; Why does every man and his dog put man pages online?; It seems planet is a bit too trusting with dates?; Trying out the Apress e-book system; Writely.com is cool; Giving bloglines a try; Has anyone else noticed that the Planet Linux Australia page is a bit sad?; Wanted: Live updating folder subscriptions in liferea; Tech talk blogs

Comment

Robert Scoble is right, Microsoft has abandoned a lot of their developers

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 15:15:00 GMT

(I know that's not an entirely accurate description of what he said).

Robert Scoble talks about the latest Microsoft MVP summit, and some of the backlash over VB 6.0 not having a recompile path to .NET and Vista. He tried to make the argument that sometimes things have to break for revolutionary change, and he's right. Then again, I'm not sure that Vista is a revolutionary change. Anyways, one aspect that Robert completely ignores is that he makes the assumption that if people are forced to do a rewrite, they'll do it on a Microsoft platform.

There are only so many times Microsoft can make you rewrite some code, before you decide to go elsewhere.

Tags for this post: dotnet vb rewrite vista
Related posts: Leon, get with the program; Windows Vista, now with nagging; SQL Server is incompatible with Windows Vista?; Microsoft taints bloggers with free laptops... or, whiney bitches win again!; Leon, my point remains

Comment

Unjustified fun making

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:58:00 GMT

The QA section at work just found the Klingon translation for the Web Service project I've been working on, and is making unjustified fun of me. To defend myself, here's how it happened...

Global product, with a few languages currently supported. I need to support different languages in my Web Service, but there aren't any other translations available for the messages yet. In fact, we're not inclined to spend the money until the messages stabilise a bit more. But I need that translation. Simon happens to own an English to Klingon dictionary, which is better than anything else we can find.

Klingon translation it is then.

Oh, it's never been shipped, and it never will be. It did test the message infrastructure though, and provided some cube fun. If only I hadn't got busted by QA.

Tags for this post: dotnet international internationalisation message translation klingon test
Related posts: Time to document my PDF testing database; Historical revisionism; CD ROM; Interesting technique for finding leaks in code; It's always the way, isn't it?; The dangers of bad automated translation; Random fact for the day; Random idea; Wanted: PDF documents; Updated pdfdb; Australian's say the darndest things

Comment

Clarke, you need to look into things a little before mouthing off

Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:57:00 GMT

Clarke Scott (who once applied for a job as a Microsoft evangelist, although we should note that I don't hold the Microsoft job application moral high ground) ~~blogs about~~ repeats verbatim without verification a post from a Microsoft evangelist based in New Zealand about Linux Australia's support for Linus' trademarking of the Linux trademark in Australia. He ignores of course that Linux Australia has been running one of the most successful Linux community events in the world for the last four or five years, or that Linus is genuinely behind the trademarking effort. He doesn't look into how the Linux Mark Institute (the international body behind the trademark) is structured. Or what their goals are.

He just comments that the community is less free as a result.

Windows is a trade mark too. How does having Linux trademarked any more restrictive that Microsoft owning the Windows mark?

Update: Clarke commented on this post to mention that I had missed that this was a quote from another site, which I am happy to concede. He also suggests the post was tongue in cheek, despite the fact that I can see no indication of that having re-read the post.

Update: Fixed broken link

Tags for this post: dotnet linux trademark
Related posts: Trademarking colours

Comment

Getting ASP.NET working on Windows XP Tablet PC edition

Wed, 17 Aug 2005 23:34:00 GMT

So, new tablet, new battle with IIS. To get ASP.NET to work (I was getting an ASP.NET is not installed error message, despite the fact that it clearly was), I needed to go to a Visual Studio command prompt and run this command:

aspnet_regiis -r

And then it all worked.

Tags for this post: dotnet asp.net microsoft visual studio .net windows xp tablet pc
Related posts: One thing about Microsoft Tablet PCs that Scoble didn't mention; Excitement in the office; HP iPaq GPS FA256A; Nice touch; Profiling your code in mono; SQL Down under; Foxtel iQ launch; Average build time for a PC; Leon, get with the program; Windows Vista, now with nagging; Names for longhorn; Microsoft not rewriting their products in .NET?; A little story from my sickness; TECRA M4 P-M 770 and Ubuntu live CDs; A side by side comparison of MythTV and Windows Media Center ; Open sourcing WinForms code?; I stand corrected on Mailman; To continue the installation fun, let's now install Max OS X; Thinkpad x41 tablet PCMCIA IO; I feel a little vindicated; On freely available guide data

Comment

I didn't get my shirt!

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:09:00 GMT

Hey! My TechEd shirt never arrived, which seem a little unfair... Perhaps they don't love me any more?

Tags for this post: dotnet microsoft teched conference flair competition shirt
Related posts: Microsoft TechEd flair; Funny; Microsoft TechEd 2005 flair; Should small ISVs be involved with the standards process?; That's one way of doing it...

Comment

Funny

Mon, 08 Aug 2005 14:14:00 GMT

This is pretty funny really.

From Darren.

Tags for this post: dotnet microsoft conference teched flair competition
Related posts: Microsoft TechEd flair; I didn't get my shirt!; Microsoft TechEd 2005 flair; Should small ISVs be involved with the standards process?; That's one way of doing it...

Comment

Microsoft TechEd flair

Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:17:00 GMT

Microsoft is encouraging joke flair for their TechEd conference. That's cool.

Tags for this post: dotnet microsoft teched conference flair competition australia
Related posts: Funny; I didn't get my shirt!; Microsoft TechEd 2005 flair; That's one way of doing it...; In Sydney!; American visas for all!; Melbourne; Sydney Australia in Google Maps; Top Gear Australia; Linux presence at Education Expo; In Australia, alive; Mirror traffic during the last day of LCA 2007; Beware the concierge at the Rendezvous Hotel!; Pandora; In Canberra; We're getting there; More on the new E-3 Visa; Mirroring the Linux Update podcast; Looking for Women studying computing in Australia; Getting ready to leave Sydney; Sensis Australian search

Comment

The state of Microsoft certification

Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:20:00 GMT

You know someone's going to make a comment like this when a story about a nine year old girl gains Microsoft certification comes out. There have been a few over history.

I'm sorry, but if a nine year old can get certified, regardless of country, gender, or overall geekiness, then the certification is to easy. Well, perhaps Doogie Howser should be allowed to get certified, but the reality is that certification should also be about real world experience and the ability to apply knowledge to the problem in hand, not just rote learning from a book. A nine year old can't have had a long consulting career yet -- can she?

Tags for this post: dotnet certification children experience
Related posts: Chicken run; A mini-slashdotting; US Hi 5; Hetherington, 82, created Mr Squiggle in 1959 - a decade before men without strings landed on the moon; Engineers Australia -- ignoring their members since 1919; Its either a third child, or Cat is pregnant with a unicorn; Australian public service announcement; So proud

Comment

Names for longhorn

Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:15:00 GMT

Robert Scoble asks for other names for longhorn, but missed the obvious -- longyawn. So, DRM that makes my pictures fuzzy, no command line (Monad has been delayed), no WinFS (guess what -- it's delayed). So, why should I upgrade if it's ever shipped?

That's the kicker -- even Robert says that you shouldn't upgrade unless you're going to get something compelling in return, and no one appears to have worked out what that compelling thing is yet.

Update: I think this quote from David at Microsoft Australia kinda sums things up:

[Describing a product in a state of flux] ...the software internals are changing more regularly than Longhorns feature list...

Tags for this post: dotnet longhorn microsoft windows
Related posts: HP iPaq GPS FA256A; Getting ASP.NET working on Windows XP Tablet PC edition; Nice touch; Foxtel iQ launch; Leon, get with the program; Windows Vista, now with nagging; A side by side comparison of MythTV and Windows Media Center ; I stand corrected on Mailman; To continue the installation fun, let's now install Max OS X; I feel a little vindicated; On freely available guide data; SQL Server is incompatible with Windows Vista?; Dear lazy web: writing to the win32 event log in Python; It's the hardware stupid; Herm. Jeremy Wright's book eats my printer driver; Why is it so amzing when things get done?; Windows source code revealed; Microsoft now requiring a valid version of Windows to install their anti spy-ware beta?

Comment

On caching of websites

Sat, 02 Jul 2005 23:46:00 GMT

Mitch talks about an article about moving from an IBM Websphere based weather.com to a Linux and open source based environment. He makes a passing comment about cachability, and that caching would improve the performance of the site.

I think that the IT industry has lost something over the last couple of years, and I think it's time for it to come back. That thing is static content. I see no reason that a largely static site such as weather.com (people read the weather, don't change it, and the content updates regularly, but nowhere near as frequently as once per click).

So, why not write an engine to generate the entire content of the site from templates, and then dump the output into a bunch of files on disc to serve? In fact, when you update the data, just change the file on disc and let the new file get served out when it's good and ready. This keeps processor load as low as possible while serving, and in fact probably makes the whole thing easier to debug. It's how my site is done too, and it makes the box that's hosting it much more responsive than it used to be under a dynamic workload.

Everything should be static, unless you can't possibly do it without some runtime code.

Tags for this post: dotnet web dynamic static content
Related posts: What do you do when the users who generate your content revolt?; Customisation of visible posts; Cataloguing meta data against multi media formats; Gartner recommends blogging over electronic content management; Looking for web form state management; Apple's Safari javascript implementation; They all use MySQL...; Gloat; Exceptions in Web Services; Web Servers, Web Applications, Web Services, Web Parts and maintaining your job security through naming conventions incomprehensible to the innocent public; PHP sample source code; Creepy; Email subscription to comments; Prior art needed: Microsoft patents XML Serialisation

Comment

Exceptions in Web Services

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:31:00 GMT

On my talking to Mitch kick, I should comment on his post on how to report exceptions from Web Services. Mitch is right. The classes of error we return from the TRIM Web Service are of the form:

Input error
Transient error
System error (call your admin)

You get rollbacks from us for free, so that's ok. The only one I've added to this list is the system error. It's possible that the server is experiencing system administrator errors, such as being out of disc, not having a dataset configured, or so forth. These really should be reported separately from the input errors and transient errors. They're not caller input, and they're only transient if the admin realises he should fix them.

We also return a unique error code for each error, which means I know exactly where in my code the problem happened, which is a feature I'm really liking from a support perspective. The Soap Fault supports an error code, so that maps nicely there.

I should point out that we don't use the Soap Fault though, we use a different Soap'ed object. Perhaps we should consider using the fault, but we didn't want to have to abandon execution of other jobs for an error in some cases.

Tags for this post: dotnet soap fault exception web service
Related posts: Web Servers, Web Applications, Web Services, Web Parts and maintaining your job security through naming conventions incomprehensible to the innocent public; Prior art needed: Microsoft patents XML Serialisation; Buy Toshiba!; Apple update; More on Apple service; On caching of websites; Apparently terrible warranty service is par for the course with Apple; The excitement of Apple service; Mono return codes; Looking for web form state management; Apple's Safari javascript implementation; They all use MySQL...; Gloat; Please don't; Let the Apple service ranting continue; Apparently I should pay more attention to pingomatic; Creepy; Did I mention that Apple service sucks?; On customer service

Comment

Hiring good people and FinalBuilder

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:24:00 GMT

Mitch comments on hiring the right people and the process that Readify uses. He mentions that it's important to have a balance between the points on Tate's hit list, which is of course right. Based on my two Microsoft interviews now, I must say that they focus a little too much on the theoretical problem solving skills, instead of looking for raw talent, or an ability to talk to customers, or read existing code. They've really focused on one of the things on that list.

It's kind of a self fulfilling prophecy, in that people seem to assume that the process that hired them is by definition the best process to use to hire a new person (presumably who will be like them).

Oh, is there a way in FinalBuilder to send an email when a build step fails but has "ignore failures" checked?

Tags for this post: dotnet hiring finalbuilder microsoft
Related posts: Collect the whole set; Calling Tate Needham, or, Hiring in Canberra; Troubles hiring people

Comment

Microsoft TechEd 2005 flair

Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:58:00 GMT

In a blast from that restaurant in Office Space, Microsoft has been providing "flair" for peoples blogs when they attend their events for some time. For example, here's the proposed flair for the TechEd 2005 conference:

Apart from the fact that flair seems like a good idea and perhaps should happen more often, I thought it might be time to do some re-mixes of the TechEd flair. Here's the one for my Windows based workplace:

And here's the one so that my nerdy friends don't make fun of me:

Tags for this post: dotnet microsoft teched conference flair
Related posts: Microsoft TechEd flair; Funny; I didn't get my shirt!; That's one way of doing it...

Comment

Wrapping a COM IStream into a .NET Stream

Wed, 08 Jun 2005 01:05:00 GMT

Our SDK returns a COM IStream when you ask it nicely. This is cool because it means that users can ask for just the parts of large documents that they want, without having to download the entire document first. Now that I'm working mainly on .NET code though, the COM IStream causes me pain...

Let's start with the fact that the COM IStream interface is nowhere near as rich as the .NET Stream. For instance, there is no way that I can see from the COM IStream to ask how long the stream is. Worse than that, the seek and position offsets use a type which is not exposed in .NET.

Does anyone have a nice solution to this problem before I write code?

Tags for this post: dotnet dotnet stream com istream
Related posts: GetOpt# 0.1; Microsoft TechEd 2005 flair; app.config for mono; Getting ASP.NET working on Windows XP Tablet PC edition; Profiling your code in mono; Regulator; Broken VSS integrations; On caching of websites; Unjustified fun making; SQL Down under; Robert Scoble is right, Microsoft has abandoned a lot of their developers; The state of Microsoft certification; Microsoft TechEd flair; MythNetTV beta 4; Funny; Names for longhorn; Microsoft not rewriting their products in .NET?; Open source .NET, should I use GTK# or the Microsoft widgets?; IIS Porn remixed; Mono return codes; Open sourcing WinForms code?

Comment

Prior art needed: Microsoft patents XML Serialisation

Mon, 30 May 2005 21:36:00 GMT

Paul Glavich points to example of the patent system gone wrong -- Microsoft has been granted a patent on XML serialisation. I can't believe that there isn't prior art for this...

Tags for this post: dotnet patent bogus microsoft xml serialisation web service
Related posts: Exceptions in Web Services; Web Servers, Web Applications, Web Services, Web Parts and maintaining your job security through naming conventions incomprehensible to the innocent public; Buy Toshiba!; xmlto very slow?; app.config for mono; Apple update; More on Apple service; On caching of websites; Apparently terrible warranty service is par for the course with Apple; The excitement of Apple service; Mirroring the Linux Update podcast; Looking for web form state management; Software patents; Apple's Safari javascript implementation; They all use MySQL...; Gloat; Let the Apple service ranting continue; Apparently I should pay more attention to pingomatic; Valid!; Creepy; Did I mention that Apple service sucks?

Comment

Microsoft not rewriting their products in .NET?

Fri, 27 May 2005 01:22:00 GMT

"Of course I still find this incredibly ironic. Microsoft insists on re-using it's own source code, and even given the ease with which they can step into Managed C++, they still preserve their existing code rather than go through the time and expense of shifting to .NET. Yet for their customers, millions of VB developers, they abandon them and leave them no choice. Funny how there's one rule for Microsoft's source code and yet another for their customers."

Quoting Bill.

I see the same push from Microsoft to port for us C programmers as well. As best as I can determine Microsoft has no intention of porting their own code away from unmanaged C / C++, but they are certainly applying a lot of pressure onto ISVs to do just this. The other thing that an ISV has to bear in mind is that a port makes you inherently less competitive -- you end up spending a bunch of engineering effort to recreate your current product, instead of adding those new features that the customers have been asking for.

Tags for this post: dotnet microsoft unmanaged managed .net port
Related posts: Getting ASP.NET working on Windows XP Tablet PC edition; Profiling your code in mono; SQL Down under; Open sourcing WinForms code?; A small example of how to find all the properties on an object using .NET reflection

Comment

Product feedback center

Fri, 20 May 2005 21:52:00 GMT

I had a simialr problem to Darren where I raised a bug with VS2005, and it was closed as not being able to be reproduced. Microsoft had posted a comment to the bug (not emailed me), and when I didn't notice within some number of days declared the bug to not be reproducable. In the end I demoed the bug for them while I was in Seattle, but I have no idea if it was actually fixed or not.

Perhaps these are more flaws in the bug tracking system -- surely posting a comment should result in email being sent, and surely you shouldn't be able to close a bug as not reproducable without all parties consent?

Tags for this post: dotnet microsoft product feedback center
Related posts: If Microsoft designed the iPod box; Naming products; A side by side comparison of MythTV and Windows Media Center ; On freely available guide data; On pitching products to bloggers; Microsoft now requiring a valid version of Windows to install their anti spy-ware beta?

Comment

Profiling your code in mono

Wed, 11 May 2005 03:00:00 GMT

Is it just me, or is profiling your code with

mono --profile

incredibly slow. I'll present some metrics later when the damn thing has finished running on just how slow.

Tags for this post: dotnet mono profile .net c#
Related posts: Regulator; A small example of how to find all the properties on an object using .NET reflection; GetOpt# 0.1; Getting ASP.NET working on Windows XP Tablet PC edition; SQL Down under; Microsoft not rewriting their products in .NET?; Open source .NET, should I use GTK# or the Microsoft widgets?; Mono return codes; Open sourcing WinForms code?

Comment