Re: [aus-dotnet] JavaScript editors that don't suck? [read: not V S or notepad]


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
    • From: silky
    • Subject: Re: [aus-dotnet] JavaScript editors that don't suck? [read: not V S or notepad]
    • Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:51:11 -0700

    just to add in another michael who agrees; i will also agree with michael and michael. my reason is that sometimes your _javascript_ may go through a compression phase and hence the 'source' you see in visual studio 2008 may not be the code that runs in the browser.



    On 7/25/07, Michael Lyons <mlyons@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    I would also agree with Michael on Firebug, but it's only for Firefox. You can also get Venkman for Mozilla (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/venkman/), I'm pretty sure that's what FireBug is built off.

     

    -----------------

    Michael Lyons

     

    From: peter@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:peter@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Ridland
    Sent: Tuesday, 24 July 2007 6:10 PM
    To: dotnet@xxxxxxxxxxx
    Subject: Re: [aus-dotnet] _javascript_ editors that don't suck? [read: not V S or notepad]

     


    I love FireBug for debugging _javascript_. It is the best debugger I have used.

    On 7/24/07, Sam Lai <samuel.lai@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:

    Aptana was the one I was gonna suggest as well - it's great, especially the intellisense. One thing that irks me about it though is that whenever you open up a script, it generates a database file for intellisense and dumps it in the same folder as your script, littering your code folders with files.

     

    Sam

     

    On 7/24/07, William Luu <WilliamL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:

    Hi Jason,

     

    I'm using Aptana [http://www.aptana.com] for all my _javascript_ing (well, only for the .js files anyway), it does produce a prompt if the file has been updated outside of itself, does do colour coding, intellisense (also tells you which browsers support what you're using).

     

    There is no refactoring support though.

     -----Original Message-----
    From: Jason Finch [mailto:jfinch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ]
    Sent: Tuesday, 24 July 2007 12:09 PM
    To: dotnet@xxxxxxxxxxx
    Subject: [aus-dotnet] _javascript_ editors that don't suck? [read: not VS or notepad]

    Ok VS sucks for _javascript_ editing. So what do the .net folks really use.

     

    I just read some details about IntelliJ IDEA and it sounds kind of cute, built in refactoring etc. 

    I'm curious if anyone is using this or any other editors to do their core _javascript_ coding, or mention ones that plain right suck.

     

    Things that I'd like.

    • Notification of file modified/prompt to reload (since I'll have file open in VS and another editor at same time)
    • colour coding,
    • intellisense
    • squiggly lines for errors (I know I'm petty)

    Nice to have:

    • built in refactoring (simple) like method/function renames.

     

    PS I'm on a PC not a Mac.

     

    Thanks,
    Jason

    This correspondence is for the named persons only.
    It may contain confidential or privileged information or both.
    No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mis transmission.
    If you receive this correspondence in error please delete it from your system immediately and notify the sender.
    You must not disclose, copy or relay on any part of this correspondence, if you are not the intended recipient.
    Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the individual sender except where the sender expressly,
    and with the authority, states them to be the opinions of the Department of Emergency Services, Queensland.

     

     




    --
    mike
    http://lets.coozi.com.au/


    (Click here for more information on the aus-dotnet mailling list)