RE: [aus-dotnet] ASP.net credentials

[Glavich, Paul C]

In your page, you can access the user and password that was used in basic
authentication like this :-

Page.Request.ServerVariables["AUTH_USER"]
Page.Request.ServerVariables["AUTH_PASSWORD"]

You can these use these credentials explicitly when adding them to the
credential cache. 


- Paul Glavich

-----Original Message-----
From: dotnet-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dotnet-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Geoff Appleby
Sent: Tuesday, 21 September 2004 2:32 PM
To: dotnet@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [aus-dotnet] ASP.net credentials

here's the error i get :)

Server Error in '/SIMTest' Application.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Default credentials cannot be supplied for the Basic authentication scheme.
Parameter name: authType
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the
current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information
about the error and where it originated in the code.

Exception Details: System.ArgumentException: Default credentials cannot be
supplied for the Basic authentication scheme. Parameter
name: authType

Source Error: 


Line 66: 		oSim.Credentials = moCache
Line 67: 		moCache.Add(New Uri(oSim.Url), "NTLM",
System.Net.CredentialCache.DefaultCredentials)
Line 68: 		moCache.Add(New Uri(oSim.Url), "Basic",
System.Net.CredentialCache.DefaultCredentials)
Line 69: 
Line 70: 
 



On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:31:18 +1000, Glavich, Paul C <paul.glavich@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Whats the exception? Are you sure that impersonation is actually 
> taking place. Ensure that the Windows Current identity reports the 
> user you have specified in the credentials.
> 
> - Paul Glavich
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dotnet-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dotnet-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Geoff Appleby
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 September 2004 1:02 PM
> To: dotnet@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [aus-dotnet] ASP.net credentials
> 
> > So enabling impersonation and using the DefaultCredentials *should* 
> > work fine. In fact, delegating those credentials (like you are here) 
> > is much easier using basic.
> 
> It _should_ work, shouldn't it? the framework throws an exception, 
> however
> :)
> 
> --
> Geoff Appleby
> http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/fredd/
> _________________
> You are a part of the Australian "dotnet" mailing list.
> To unsubscribe send "unsubscribe dotnet" or to re-subscribe send 
> "subscribe dotnet Your Name" in the body of the email to: 
> imailsrv@xxxxxxxxxxx List managed by: http://www.stanski.com
> 
> 
> _________________
> You are a part of the Australian "dotnet" mailing list.
> To unsubscribe send "unsubscribe dotnet" or to re-subscribe send 
> "subscribe dotnet Your Name" in the body of the email to: 
> imailsrv@xxxxxxxxxxx List managed by: http://www.stanski.com
> 



--
Geoff Appleby
http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/fredd/
_________________
You are a part of the Australian "dotnet" mailing list.
To unsubscribe send "unsubscribe dotnet" or to re-subscribe send "subscribe
dotnet Your Name" in the body of the email to: imailsrv@xxxxxxxxxxx List
managed by: http://www.stanski.com
_________________
You are a part of the Australian "dotnet" mailing list.
To unsubscribe send "unsubscribe dotnet" or to re-subscribe send "subscribe dotnet Your Name" in the body of the email to: imailsrv@xxxxxxxxxxx
List managed by: http://www.stanski.com